Sundance: Spike Jonze strikes 'I'm Here' deal

Director Spike Jonze has proven again that he can make magic in any format. The director of Where the Wild Things Are created a beautiful 30-minute short called I’m Here about young love in Los Angeles. The film, which debuted here as part of the festival’s short program, feels like a modern-day retelling of Shel Silverstein’s The Giving Tree, with two crudely constructed robots serving as the protagonists. Financed by Absolut Vodka, IFC claims it has reached a deal to air I’m Here — while others say the details has not yet been finalized.

Regardless, the buzz about Jonze’s short is undeniable. The director admits to the Silverstein influence, adding that he named his main character Sheldon in honor of the 1970s poet and storyteller. “I was trying to take the influence of The Giving Tree, but write about relationships,” says Jonze. “I love Shel Silverstein. I just love him.” Jonze hired Andrew Garfield (The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus) and Sienna Guillory to don robot costumes, while his special effects crew did a fantastic job drawing emotions out of robot heads that resembled the old Apple Macintosh Classic computer.

And how does Jonze feel about Where the Wild Things Are — his risky, big-budget adaptation of the children’s classic — now that some time has passed. He’s thrilled. “I feel like we got to make the movie that was in my heard,” says Jonze. “It was hard along the way but in the end, I feel like we got away with murder. We got to make this personal film on this [huge] scale.”

Comments (3 total) Add your comment
  • Marcus

    I can’t wait to see I’M HERE! Spike Jonze is a freakin’ genius!

  • Jose

    “…that was in my heard,”
    Check your spelling next time EW,
    and I’m also excited to see this movie!Where the Wild Things Are was awesome!

  • Ben

    The problem I have with this short is that there is no change in the protagonist. There is no transformation, and no character arc. Ultimately it is a simple, and predictable, portrait of a situation, beautifully and sensitively rendered, with a ‘neat’ device, but one-dimensional non-the-less. I think this is the reason why it is not as emotive as it might have been.

Add your comment
The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.

Latest Videos in Movies


TV Recaps

Powered by VIP