Do you think Tim Burton ever imagined his adaptation of Alice in Wonderland would have become such a behemoth? Well, it’s certainly become one: The Read the full post.
May 4
2010
03:11 PM ET
'Alice in Wonderland' lands in top ten films of all time; bumps 'The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers'
- Comments 80
- Add comment
Latest News
- 'X-Men': Gay wedding storyline in the works
- 'House' finale: Healthy uptick in ratings
- 'Lost': Damon Lindelof has 'no regrets'
- 'Walking Dead': Season 3 teaser posted
- Chris Harrison's 'Bachelorette' blog
- 'House' series finale: Ken Tucker's take
- 'House' finale reaction? Vote in our poll
- 20 best TV series finales ever
Find Movies and Showtimes
Powered by MovieTickets.com
Choose Your Movie
All movies
Most Commented
Top 5 Most Read
- ‘House’ series finale recap: ‘Everybody Dies’…did House?
- ‘House’ series finale review: All’s well that ends musically
- ‘Celebrity Apprentice’: Arsenio Hall talks about Trump’s verdict, being reunited with Aubrey…
- 20 Best TV Series Finales Ever
- 'The Bachelorette' recap: The Lovers, the Dreamers, and Emily








Since it is in the top ten grossing films worldwide it will undoubtedly stay there for a long time. Why it has received so much criticism in the US remains a mystery to me. One says it was predictable and another says it wasn’t explained and yet another it wasn’t like the original then it wasn’t original enough. Personally I loved it and I think it is fantastic it is in the top ten worldwide.
I don’t think ticket sales would even work. You have to realize that the population is so much bigger than it was in the Gone With the Wind Days. So how would you account for that. Problem is no matter what you did it would not be fair because of one reason or another. Like something I read that someone wrote once. You just can’t compare movies from times past to movies today. There are just to many changes to really keep it all on the same plane. Then who decides what equation to use. Really it just boils down to that most of the population doesn’t care about splitting hair like that. They just want to know what is doing well now. Not what did well 50 years ago. Heck not even 15 years ago. When I was a kid it was star wars was the big movie. It had its day and now that is over. I have no problem with that. I just don’t see why people are freaking out because one movie did better that another gross wise. Do people really need validation that much for a movie they like that didn’t go that far up the gross scale.
why don’t they re-release the LOTR trilogy in 3D IMAX, even if only for a short period of time, and see how much money it makes?
Probably the best indicator is how long a movie keeps running in theaters, especially compared to other movies coming out the same weekend. I don’t think Alice lasted all that long, actually…
The only reason for this is the cost of 3D. Nowadays it’s not hard for a film to do well with the added 3-5 dollars for a pair of plastic glasses. It’s what made Avatar so much money. If you look at units sold, you’ll find there considerably less then movies like Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, and Gone with the Wind (the best selling movie of all time)
The 3-D effects were brilliant except there was no plot to the movie…
I’m a massive Burton fan [even that's underselling it to be honest] and even I thought that Alice was completely soulless.
Visually it was lovely and there were definately some great performances from stars like Depp, Carter, Glover, etc. But on the whole it was just, as so many people have stated, flat. It’s position in the highest grossing films is surely a product of the higher ticket price, 3D hype, savvy marketing, and the dual effect of both Depp and Burton’s popularity.
Personally, I’m torn with the whole 3D debate. As a viewer I find it extremely exciting, but as a film-maker I can’t help but feel that it has become a bit of a gimmick to gloss over a lack of proper plot/characerization/*insert common problem here* and I think it heavily detracts from a lot of the skill and ingenuity that went into developing the film in the first place.
Well I’m very happy for Tim Burton and the Walt Disney Company. I’m also happy to see that the 3D film blitz has spilled over into the computer industry with Nintendo now briging a new 3D handheld to the markey at next months E3 and the rumor that Apple might release a 3D iPad if the Nintendo “3DS” is successful.
I really enjoyed the classic Disney animated Alice in Wonderland and I also enjoyed Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland and I look forward to it’s arrival on DVD.
I think that Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was nice but it can’t hold a pail of water to Mr. Burton’s Alice in Wonderland. I’m a 21 year old male so it might be unusual for me to dislike “Charie” as opposed to “Alice” but I’ve always liked tales with girls in the lead such as the classic Judy Garland “Wizard of Oz.”