Image Credit: Simon MeinWhen it comes to the British writer-director Mike Leigh, I have a series of likes and dislikes that will strike some as perverse. His most popular films tend to leave me cold. Secrets & Lies (1996), for instance, was the first movie I ever saw at the Cannes Film Festival (back in 1996), and I thought then, and still think now, that it’s an irritatingly sitcomish, bloke-ified Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, with Brenda Blethyn in a performance as annoying as it is brilliant. (I know that’s supposed to be the point, but annoying isn’t a quality that allows for a lot of ambiguity.) I thought Naked (1993) made nihilism as heavy as an anvil, and two years ago, in Happy-Go-Lucky (2008), though I enjoyed Sally Hawkins’ cockeyed-optimist performance, by the time the driving instructor who it was obvious from the get-go was a head case was revealed to be a head case, I felt bludgeoned, hectored, and, yes, annoyed. I tend to prefer Leigh’s quieter films, like the sublime Topsy-Turvy (1999) or the wily and touching Career Girls (1997). So when I say that I loved Another Year, the Leigh film that just premiered at Cannes, members of the Leigh cult should consider themselves warned: The movie has precious little in the way of shrieking, didactic working-class sanctimony, or cheaply lovable over-the-top gags.
What it does have is an overwhelming bittersweet melancholy at the passing of life from middle age into…well, I guess you could call it late middle age, but then you’d be falling into the self-deceptive trap shared by the movie’s characters, who will do anything to avoid the realization that the cold and nasty word for the condition they’re heading towards is…old. (You know, the condition that happens to other people.)
This time, Leigh doesn’t bother with the pretense of a story; like a more boisterous Eric Rohmer, he simply splits the movie into four seasonal chapters over the course of a year, thereby liberating it from the clank of narrative. It’s touching to see Ruth Sheen, so memorable in the first Leigh film to be released in the U.S., High Hopes (1988), now with graying hair and sagging jowls, but with her rabbity grin as beatific as ever. She’s teamed with that marvelous rascal Jim Broadbent (that’s them, above, with Oliver Maltman). The two play a vaguely bohemian couple who have found and held onto that fragile thing — happiness — as they watch the friends and relatives who cluster around them make far less successful stabs at it.
And what a randomly moving collection of troubled, romantic, confused, world-weary, stubbornly deluded souls they are! The characters, between big gulps of wine, specialize in that scalding English thing, “taking the piss” out of each other, but there’s no mockery in Leigh’s view, only grace. At times, the movie is like the Beatles’ “Eleanor Rigby” turned into a startlingly humane comedy. Amid the usual Leigh slew of lived-in performances, one of the actors achieves greatness: Lesley Manville, who plays Sheen and Broadbent’s most regular, and desperate, Saturday night dinner companion, a fragile, sozzled, enthusiastically needy secretary who has been coyly girlish, and drunk, for so long that she has no idea the loneliness she’s seeking to escape is of her own devising. The final shot is just her face, staring, as everyone else babbles away at the dinner table, and it’s one of the most haunting, volumes-speaking final shots in the history of cinema.
* * * *
Image Credit: Keith HamshereThe atrociously titled You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger is one of Woody Allen’s “fables” — which could almost be code, at this point, for the flavorless, dry-cookie thing that results when he writes and directs a comedy on autopilot. The film is notable, if that’s the word, for being the first movie Allen has made in London that is every bit as bad as his most awful New York comedies, like Anything Else and Melinda and Melinda.
There should, by now, be an award for worst actor forced to impersonate Woody Allen in a Woody Allen film. I would probably give the award to Kenneth Branagh in Celebrity (with Scarlett Johansson as a close runner-up in Scoop). But if Josh Brolin, in You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger, doesn’t quite enter the make-it-stop stratosphere of whiny fumbly stuttering embarrassment, he’s still got to be the least likely actor ever to play a faux-Woody neurotic intellectual. When he has to say a line like “I’m a nervous wreck,” Brolin doesn’t look nervous. He looks like he wants to punch someone out. Maybe the director.
Wearing, for some reason, an early-’80s shaggy disco coif that makes him look like an angry Harry Hamlin, Brolin plays an expatriate American physician-turned-novelist (don’t ask) who has one successful book to his credit, but now his well has gone dry. He and Naomi Watts, as a British-born art-gallery assistant, are stuck in a sniping marriage, and you know what happens in a bad Woody film when people are miserably hitched: They seek liberation! Crazy love! With sexy-time fantasy mates! Played by exotic, even “foreign” actors! (In this case, Antonio Banderas and Slumdog Millionaire‘s Barbie-doll beautiful Freida Pinto.) Cast as love objects so idealized they might as well be made of wax! Meanwhile, Watts’ mother (Gemma Jones), abandoned by her husband, becomes adicted to the musings of a sham psychic (how outrageous!), and her ex-mate, played by Anthony Hopkins, becomes another one of Woody’s aging-bachelors-who-lands-a-young-babe-who-has-never-even-heard-of-Kierkegaard. In this case, however, when the white-haired Hopkins falls for a vulgar statuesque platinum-blonde Cockney hooker played by Lucy Punch, the two are so jaw-droppingly ill-matched that it’s like watching the love affair of Alan Arkin and Lady Gaga.








Worthless review written by a boring critic. Allen’s films are anything but boring and it is incrediably telling that the two films mentioned “Anything Else” and “Melinda and Melinda” are among Allen’s best and freshest works.
Even after decades of varied and impressive works Allen is still entirely misunderstood. It is a sign of a sub-par critic that when an established and prolific filmmaker makes another movie they expect that it is a movie made for them. I’m sorry Owen but Allen’s range far exceeds your own.
You’re the only one who would regard “Anything Else” and “Melinda and Melinda” as his freshest works; they are so stilted they are out of place in our time zone. You obviously haven’t even seen half of Woody’s works, if you did, you would know to start in the mid-1970′s. And Owen couldn’t possibly be a boring critic — you read his entire post. Good job, Proman, you’re the kind of person whose modus operandi must be to kill good movie conversation. When idiots like you make comments they should be immediately stricken from the record.
“Anything Else” is probably Woody Allen’s most underrated movie.
Anything Else is practically a remake of Annie Hall
“Match Point” is practically a remake of “Crime and Misdemeanors,” but it’s still a wonderful movie.
I stopped trusting Owen Gleiberman’s opinion after he called ‘O’Brother, Where Art Thou’ the worst movie of that year. I still find Woody’s underrated movies very entertaining..
even the one where he had the psychosomatic blindness.
Um, this response is insane. Anything Else is unwatchable, and Allen’s movies this last decade have seemed like they come from another planet, where no one acts or talks like human beings you’ve ever remembered encountering. This review of Owen’s is harsh, but Woody Allen has now made many many terrible movies and deserves a harsh review now and then when he makes one.
I agree with you about HAPPY-GO-LUCKY, I was so annoyed by Sally Hawkins’ character, I wanted Eddie Marsan to kill her!!!!! Still thrilled she wasn’t nominated!
Anyone who didn’t like ‘Happy-Go-Lucky’ or sided with Eddie Marsan’s character is probably a miserable sob…poor guy.
Did he actually mention Mike Leigh and NOT mention his greatest film (not to mention a Top 10 All-Time Great from the 2000s) “Vera Drake”? Shame!
And outside of “Annie Hall”, I can’t say I really appreciate the work of Woody Allen. Oh, and “Antz”, great voice work!
The review is pompous and full of geriatric rants that he ascribes in Woody Allen films he detests. We need fresh voices in film reviews — and it’s time to go, OG.
Agreed! We need fresh voices for film reviews of stale filmmakers. How about the retired, widowed 80 year old who lives next door to me?
“All or Nothing,” is a Leigh film that I would be interested to see how OG placed in his insightful article.
Seconded, sbwm. I have come to love “Secrets and Lies” for its performances and its coziness, but agree with Gleibs that its dramatic situations are sitcom synthetic. “All of Nothing” is a close cousin to “Secrets and Lies” but for whatever reason I think it’s a deeper, sadder, more authentic film…one of my favorites from the past ten years. I’d be curious to know what he thinks of it.
Maybe it’s that I’m not a New Yorker, but Woody Allen’s output from the ’90s on–save for Matchpoint and Sweet and Lowdown–is atrocious. I especially despised Whatever Works, despite being a Larry David fan. Can the nutjobs who trashed Glieberman for saying the Emperor has no clothes please get over themselves and admit that Allen’s maybe not as sharp or profound a filmmaker as he used to be? I love Martin Scorsese myself, and even I’ve had to admit that Shutter Island is a misfire and that The Departed is highly enjoyable but over-rated.
Happy Go Lucky is the only Mike Leigh film I have ever seen and I truly loved it! This summer I plan to watch all of his other works and eagerly anticipate Another Year.
I would hate to say that Woody Allen should throw in the towel, because his bad movies outnumber his good ones 3-1 since the 90′s, but maybe he needs to try something with less dialogue and age-appropriate pairings – no more geriatric male + barely legals, please.
Woody Allen obviously became a hit-and-miss filmmaker around the time of “Celebrity.” He might make magic (“Sweet and Lowdown,” “Matchpoint”), he might make something very forgettable (“Hollywood Ending”), he might make something not-so-great (“Anything Else”). However, he is still one of the masters of American cinema. He has to his credit some of the greatest movies ever made (“Annie Hall,” “Purple Rose of Cairo,” “Crimes and Misdemeanors”) — so I don’t really appreciate Owen’s mocking tone. Owen has the right to dislike his film, but I think Woody Allen has earned enough respect not to be essentially laughed at.
I didn’t see anything that was joyfully derisive in OG’s review. But people who are overly defensive about their favorite filmmakers always seem to misconstrue a valid critique as a personal attack.
I guess you missed all the exclamation points.
I think perhaps Gleiberman is expressing more frustration at how bad a Woody Allen movie gets when it’s bad, especially 2000s Woody Allen movies. Honestly, he’s made some terrible movies that make me angry every step of the way, and Anything Else is a perfect example. I don’t think it’s a critic’s job to be obnoxiously referential, and Gleiberman has said more than enough glowing things about Allen when the occasion called for it. In one column some years back he even asked readers to reconsider Stardust Memories as one of the great movies of his career. Who else would take the time to pull out a positive argument that obscure?
Woody Allen’s “Match Point” is the only film of his I’ve enjoyed in ages…I’ve stopped giving him the benefit of the doubt. For some reason, his “genius” didn’t really carry over into 90s. He’s made a couple good movies since then, but he hasn’t made a great movie since 1986. The ridiculously overrated Vicky Cristina Barcelona is proof that Hollywood likes to lavish its icons with awards no matter how undeserving. However, that tendency to overpraise has probably hurt Allen because it allows him to think that whatever he puts out is great because it’s Woody Allen putting it out, and therefore he never challenges himself anymore.
Woody Allen should retire. Full stop.
I agree totally. Mr Allen hasn’t made a decent film in 20 plus years.Yet he keeps cranking out dreck that no one goes to see. He needs to full-on RETIRE.
Mike Leigh on the other hand never runs out of good ideas or films. Even one of Leigh’s “lesser” works beats Allens last 20 year output by leaps and bounds.
In the past 20 years, Woody Allen has written and directed “Bullets Over Broadway,” “Mighty Aphrodite,” “Everyone Says I Love You,” “Deconstructing Harry,” “Sweet and Lowdown” and “Match Point.” Saying he hasn’t made a “decent” movie in “20-plus years” is ridiculously absurd.
Josh Brolin doing Woody Allen material does sound awful. He already did Melinda and Melinda which I think is Allen’s worst movie and that’s really saying something. I think Will Ferrell in that movie gave another one of the worst Allen impersonations. I like Brolin but he’s not neurotic in any way and should stick to movies where he carries a gun. Woody either does movies I can’t stand such as Melinda and Melinda and Zelig or movies I really like such as Match Point and Sweet and Lowdown.
“no more geriatric male + barely legals, please.”
I know. That has become really overused in his films and its getting ridiculous.
Woody Allen is one of our greatest filmmakers. Mike Leigh is also wonderful. I treasure all of their movies. Life is too short. Ignore the films and filmmakers you dislike. Where’s the joy in trashing something other people enjoy? Go see Avatar or Robin Hood or something.
Seriously??!!! You just called BOTH Naked and Secrets and Lies bad movies. What are you snorting??!!!