Image Credit: Everett CollectionIf you put your ear to the ground and listen closely, you can, on occasion, hear the grumbly murmur of moviegoers chewing over the fact that Hollywood film culture, more than ever, has become a déjà vu landscape of sequels, remakes, reboots, and rehashes. Pastiches of the past. The complaining never gets all that loud, though, since that would sort of be like griping about the air we breathe. Everyone knows — and more or less accepts — that we now live in Rerun Nation. It is, on some level, the movie culture that we assent to and ask for, week after week, with our ticket purchases. Just look at this weekend, in which The Karate Kid has already set the box office ablaze. A lot of people wanted to see that movie. I’m a fan myself (here’s my review), but the fact that it’s such a known quantity is clearly the essence of its appeal. The same goes for The A-Team, with its more modest but still successful opening. I often wish that we didn’t live in Rerun Nation, but what’s clear is that we choose to live there because it’s a cozy and comfortable place to be.
What strikes me this week is how long we’ve been living there. Our sequel-and-remake culture first kicked into high gear in the 1980s, the era of high concept, when the blockbuster mentality began to colonize the minds of everyone in Hollywood. That’s when the DNA of the audience started to get reprogrammed, too. If you think about the two current 1980s remakes, you’ll realize that they’re both really recyclings of recyclings. Even the originals, in essence, were second-hand goods. That was a major part of their appeal, way back when.
Take The A-Team. As a TV show, it was a pure example of the pop-culture past repackaged into cheesy, chewy, prefab-digestible form. Obviously, you can say that about a lot of things on TV, but The A-Team was a show that wore its cardboard-action derivative thinness proudly. Basically, with its squad of outlaw heroes — commandos as “war criminals” — trying to plot and improvise their way through a weekly tactical mission, it was The Dirty Dozen crossed with Mission: Impossible, and with one additional, almost eerily karmic overlap. The show premiered just two months after the release of the original Rambo movie, First Blood (1982). And either through zeitgeist coincidence or the likely possibility that the series’ creator/producers, Stephen J. Cannell and Frank Lupo, were familiar with the 1972 David Morrell novel on which First Blood was based, The A-Team‘s Vietnam backstory — during the war, the team members carried out a violent mission as ordered, and were then hung out to dry by their superiors — totally echoed the fate of the Sylvester Stallone character (a Vietnam vet) in the hit guerrilla action thriller. Like the movie, the show served up suicide-mission macho as “anti-establishment” kicks.
There was, of course, an additional Stallone connection: Mr. T first dive-bombed his way into American culture in Rocky III (1982), where, as the relentless, in-your-face, this-is-white-America’s-worst-nightmare Clubber Lang, he was vicious and cool and — yes — kind of scary. (He had to be; it was Stallone’s way of upping the ante on Apollo Creed.) Since Mr. T, in spirit, was more pro wrestler than actor, he gave the same essential performance on The A-Team, only now, in all his Mohawked warrior finery, he was cuddly: Clubber Lang as gruff good guy. He still had his I-pity-the-fool charisma, but he was a walking emblem of Rerun Nation from the moment he stepped onto the A-Team set.
So what about The Karate Kid? Despite the huge turnout for the new version, there’s been a lot of negative energy in the message-board postings on my review. The anger at Jaden Smith is kind of ugly — it’s got a Tea Party-ish, look at what the Hollywood Man is foisting on us now! vibe, as if the fact that this kid is Will Smith’s son were somehow an outrage. (Yes, that’s how he got the gig; he also happens to be a dynamic little actor.) And there’s all this angry sentiment about messing with a “classic.” Okay, look: I called the 1984 version of The Karate Kid a “classic” in my review, because I didn’t know what else to call it. It’s a hugely popular movie in our culture, and it’s one that I’ve always enjoyed, but let’s get real. It was never a great movie — it was a likable, go-for-it confection, patched together out of bits and pieces from the not-so-distant movie past.
As an underdog fight fable, it was a junior version of Rocky (my God, Stallone again! — I guess he really did rule). But the irresistible power hook of The Karate Kid was the playfully strict basic-training gamesmanship of the Mr. Miyagi wax-the-car-and-master-the-movement fight-study sequences, and what was funny and catchy and appealing about them is that they were Star Wars redux. Ralph Macchio’s Daniel had to submit to practice, discipline, and Zen concentration. He had to learn how to use the force of karate. He was a teenybop-geek Luke Skywalker in judo robes, with Pat Morita’s Mr. Miyagi as his courtly Asian Obi-Wan.
With the A-Team and Karate Kid remakes released on the same day, everyone took brief, obvious note of the ’80s-nostalgia factor, but I was almost surprised that more media outlets didn’t exploit the opportunity of this double scoop of Age of Reagan popcorn to really go back and taste the flavor of those years. Then again, the 1980s marked the first moment in American life when going back to the future really meant going forward into the past. With films like The Karate Kid and shows like The A-Team, the era was, in a sense, already looking back on itself. And we’ve all been looking back ever since.
So who loves — or doesn’t — the original Karate Kid? The original A-Team? And who’s planning on seeing the new Karate Kid or the new A-Team this weekend? If so, are you going for the sake of nostalgia, or with the expectation that you might actually see something new?








You’re review should’ve been just that; a review….
Not this pile of s**t you dropped on us..Tea Party-ish? Realllyyy? You had to politicize your review so now we know where you stand, you liberal pig.. Next time, stick to what the job description is. BTW, your review sucked.
Do you know what a review is because this was obviously an analysis.
This wasn’t his review. This is an essay/blog post. Just FYI.
Catherine is a moron.
And as analysis it was pretty solid. Mentioning the Tea Party wasn’t a politicizing move, he was talking about the anger his review stirred up on message boards. Supporting or opposing the Tea Party, you have to agree their rallies stir up a lot of anger. This is really knee-jerk anger towards a rather objective, interesting post.
So people can’t express emotion without being compared to the Tea Party? Go suck on Owen’s C*ck, Ethan.
To Ethan…Uh as an analogy, the Tea Party was an expression of anger. It might have been a bit much but the analogy was apt. Not sure what the fuss is all about unless you are just looking for something to complain about.
Look, everybody knows the “Tea Party” people are the same yahoos that never piped up when Bush was really screwing them over. Well, that’s not true, they would open their yaps long enough to say that you should never critisize the president during war time, doing so is giving aid and comfort to the enemy, blah, blah, blah. And we see now that’s all it was, just a cynical political talking point, nothing that they really believed on any level. These people are some of the worst humanity has to offer, just the scum of the earth.
Gosh, wouldn’t it be nice if people actually knew how to *read* these days, before they foamed at the mouth about things they clearly didn’t understand? The Age of Enlightenment is over, and sweet reason is in hiding. Catherine, you may not be a “liberal pig,” but you sure are an ignorant one.
Catherine, your knee-jerk comment is exactly what Owen was referring to when he used the term “Tea Party-ish.” Aren’t there more important things to be angry about than a made-up adjective that an entertainment writer uses in a piece outlining some of his opinions of some remakes? Misplaced outrage can be a dangerous thing.
This isn’t political, babe. Both of them were pretty good 80s movies (though the A-Team is better in both cases). He’s not being political, he’s expressing his opinion. Difference. Now please keep your opinions to yourself next time.
Anybody who says the Tea Party is anything but a joke (except maybe…idiotic) is naive, racist, and worst…conservative.
A Team, but only because of Bradley Cooper! the action is for the husband, the eye candy is for me!
Crap in the 80s, crap now. Nothing has changed.
Between Patrick Wilson, Bradley Cooper, and Liam Neeson (it’s the Irish brogue, what can I say?), this movie is a veritable eye candy buffet. And come to think of it, Quinton Jackson’s kind of a looker. A bit on the bulky side, but still a looker.
That’s the only reason why my friend and I are going to see it. Our husbands want no part of that drivel. Yeah, Baby. Eye Candy!
Nice article. I love these blogs of Owen’s.
I’m a baby boomer and Jaden is hot…I loved him in Happyness, he broke my heart, so he has a BIG following among adults and tweenies….plus he’s cute.
that’s not creepy. not at all.
You said it, Ani. A person of “boomer age” calling a little boy hot is disturbing.
Sally might want to meet the local police.
Sally, Chris Hansen from Dateline is here. He’d like you to have a seat.
If you’re a teenager, that’s OK. If not, that’s disturbing.
Either way, the heading “the Movie Critics” implies that they are reviewing a movie.. Heading is not “BLOG about the karate kid, A team with a splash of hatin’ on conservatives”
Maybe the conservatives need to get a thicker skin, or get off of the boards of an entertainment website. He didn’t disparage the Tea-Party, merely invoked them in describing the vituperative reaction that Jaden Smith is getting from people. If he had instead referenced the NAACP and their reaction to the Duke lacrosse scandal (to pick a reference) you wouldn’t have batted an eye.
And let me take a stab at this: you’re either a liberal or an “independent.” That’s right, purely objective I’m sure. In referencing the angst of the Tea Party in his movie review, the guy is clearly implying that these people have no right to be upset. He’s comparing the disappointment people have in the direction the president is taking their country to the disappointment people have in the casting of a movie. No difference there? Really? Why can’t people just keep politics out of it? The guy’s a critic. I didn’t open up a story about sequels to get his slant on life. Sorry, this stuff bugs me.
Well, the Tea Party movement does remind me of some other rather disenfranchised movements by past conservative-minded parties that spawn such movements by claiming it was for “the greater good” and the “God-given right of freedom”. And yes, I would say their fervor and indignation is wantonly overwrought in one of the most stable countries of the world. Furthermore, if you only want to read reviews from movie critics then why did you read the article in the first place? Angelina Jolie “the actress” wrote an article in The Economist that was decidedly not about acting. Would you have defined your expectations of the article solely by the writer’s most notable profession there, too?
It implies nothing of the kind. It doesn’t say “review,” as all the reviews on this site are.
Dave is a doucccche AND a Dickkkk…You’re so much fun to play Dickkkkk
Just saw the Karate Kid with my 5 year old son and I thought it was excellent. Little Jaden (Xiao Dre) is really quite a good actor and I expect him to have a bright future ahead of him in this profession. Jackie chan out-miyagi’d old Pat Morita and the two of them had great chemistry. They took the old story (which holds a place in my heart) and made it so much better. In the theater we went to, everyone was clapping and cheering for Xiao Dre with every punch and kick he landed. Most remakes and rehashes miss the mark but this one made me believe that you can make a better movie with the right elements.
Of course he will, dad & mom will make sure of it.
Jackie Chan’s cool, but he’s no Miyagi.
I just saw the movie with my family. The kids loved it, I loved it, my husband loved it. We agree that the story has been completely updated but have absolutely no complaints. We are fans of the Smith family and all of their work and have no doubt the children will follow bright paths as well (whatever they may choose). Overall…it was great.
the heading “Movie Critics” is simply a description of the two writers – not WHAT they are writing; obviously, the movie reviews are found in the review section of this site and are followed by a grade designating the critic’s assessment.
Yeah. I would prefer that those who fail at comprehension while reading the title of an article ought not be allowed to condemn the writer for disappointing them.
I read the comments on his Karate Kid review and was shocked at the borderline hate for Jaden. I wonder if people got this outraged at Scott Caan, or Robert Downey Jr., or Drew Barrymore, or Freddy Prinze Jr. and on and on. I like Jaden and as long as his performances continue to be solid I’ll keep watching his movies. If you don’t like his parents that fine but otherwise you just sound jealous of a pre-teen. Not cute.
I doubt that there was any outrage at all over Caan, Downey, Berrymore, or Prinze, because (a) they have talent and (b) their casting in high profile movies wasn’t so obviously tied to their famous families.
Well Brett (a) Drew Barrymore and Freddie Prinze Jr. really aren’t very talented. And Except for Downey every one of them is famous because of their last names. Don’t pretend Scott Caan would be in anything without his Dad. Not that he can’t act. But he can’t act enough to have made it without that help. Same goes for Freddie and “Elvis with a stroke” Barrymore.
It’s interesting how the people who are so critical of these movies are not seeing them first before saying how awful they are. And those who are saying bad things about the young mr.Smith are not the ones supporting the film’s successful opening weekend, so their negative opinions have no juice. I didn’t hate the film, but it was serviceable and the “Target audience” absolutely loved it.
I like how a criticism is made and then someone brings out the jealousy card as if that must be the reason why people are annoyed by this kid. Jaden Smith has been awful in everything I have seen him in and he keeps getting work because of daddy. Also, I think Owen wrote this because their has been a lot of anger towards the new Karate Kid and so he’s writing this to defend his review. That’s why the first post by Catherine says that he should have left his review alone instead of coming up with this to defend it.
reread her post. she clearly thinks this post in a review.
Agreed. I haven’t seen the movie yet, but the kid has had zero charisma in everything I’ve seen him in. I’ve always thought he only got his roles because his parents campaigned for him. That doesn’t people have the right to hate him but he really has been awful up to now, so a little skeptism is understandable.
Jaden obviously got the part because of Will Smith. But he’s a pretty good actor for a kid.
Not planning seeing either – not because I don’t approve of them being made but simply a matter of movies being too darn expensive. I’m sure I’ll watch both once released to DVD or stream them on Netflix.
Save your time and money. There are other films more worthy of each.
Just went and saw The Karate Kid, and I was blown away. I remember my mom taking me to see the first one, and I have to admit that I was really against this being remade, but they really did a good job. It’s a good movie all on it’s own and something for the whole family.
It’s sad to see people on here critizing an 11 year old boy. Jaden Smith did an excellent job in this movie. He was more believable than a lot of adult actors I’ve seen. It’s okay to have an opinion but don’t spew hate. If you don’t like the idea of a remake or the movie that’s fine, but hating on an 11 year old just makes you a degenerate.
A “degenerate”? Really, Patricia? That’s the word you want to use? Has anybody said they want to hurt the boy?? No, they’ve said he’s annoying and/or lacks talent. Save words like “degenerate” for those who truly deserve that adjective.
At least she could spell “degenerate”
So you’ve dismissed the entirety of her post by objecting to one word within it. Nice! You have a fine career as a campaign manager in the next election. Slander and vilify! You’ll do just swell.
while the original Karate Kid isn’t a new concept itself, it was executed in its own unique way…the new karate kid is way more of a rip-off of the original than the original is a rip-off of Rocky
have you seen it? I didn’t think it was a rip off at all. There were a few nods to the original, but they were subtle and no real attention was brought to them. The story stands on its own. I didn’t think it was the best movie I ever saw, but it was enjoyable and Jaden Smith did a good job in the part. Not a real stretch for him to play his age, but he was natural and at ease in the role. We’ll see if time shows whether he has real talent or not.
JBM if you think that this movie wasn’t a rip off and the story ‘stands on its own’ then wouldn’t you agree that this movie should have been called a different name? Calling the ‘remake’ The Karate Kid is a joke. They practice Kung Fu, which is a totally different discipline than karate. This is an arrogant mistake and I think it is an offense to the Chinese culture. They should have called this the Kung Fu Kid then. Hollywood is a disgrace. I also think Hollywood should try casting new faces and giving underground actors a chance. I’m tired of seeing the same people recycled in these movies. LAME!
Already remaking 1980s films (I suppose it started with Batman, which started its string in 1989 (almost the 90s) and already suffered a reboot. Really now…starting over every decade and a half?
I suppose the Back To The Future Trilogy is next on the leftovers menu. At least with that one we are only 5 years earlier than the “future” from Part II.
shhhh, the hollywood mogels might hear you.
uh oh, I can hear the whispers in the boardrooms now…
“Batman Begins” was not a remake of the 1989 “Batman” anymore than a new James Bond movie is a remake of previous James Bond movies. Don’t confuse a reboot of a character with a remake of a movie.