In the issue of EW that came out 20 years ago this week (cover story: Elvis Presley!), I gave negative reviews to a pair of Read the full post.
Aug 26
2010
12:28 PM ET
Owen's reviews revisited: Was I wrong to pan 'Metropolitan' and 'Pump Up the Volume'? Yes and no
- Comments 32
- Add comment
Latest News
- 'Dark Knight Rises': Striking new posters
- 'Idol' Top 2: Who won each week?
- Joan Rivers to guest on 'Drop Dead Diva'
- 'X-Men': Gay wedding storyline in the works
- Brad Pitt: Killer role at Cannes
- 'Lost': Damon Lindelof has 'no regrets'
- 'Walking Dead': Season 3 teaser posted
- Chris Harrison's 'Bachelorette' blog
Find Movies and Showtimes
Powered by MovieTickets.com
Choose Your Movie
All movies
Most Commented
Top 5 Most Read
- ‘House’ series finale recap: ‘Everybody Dies’…did House?
- ‘House’ series finale review: All’s well that ends musically
- ‘Celebrity Apprentice’: Arsenio Hall talks about Trump’s verdict, being reunited with Aubrey…
- 20 Best TV Series Finales Ever
- 'The Bachelorette' recap: The Lovers, the Dreamers, and Emily








Metropolitian was fuzzy and boring. now things really came alive with Last Days of Disco. Oh those pre-yuppies were completely glorious and ridiculous. It’s one of my favorite movies and definitely a favorite of his.
Owen, I really like these posts where you revisit a review. It’s a great idea. I’ve been a critic in my life and I’ve also had the “pleasure” of that awkward encounter where you meet someone whose work you panned. It often turns out they know your review and they are pretty amiable about it, though they definitely want to tell you why you’re so wrong, wrong, wrong. You’d be lying if you didn’t feel a twinge of guilt. It’s also not uncommon to become friendly with them. And then, lo and behold, when you see their work from then on — well, it’s genius! Yeah, everything just lights up for you, doesn’t it? And the thing you panned in the first place? Why, damn, you missed the boat. It’s actually MUCH better than you thought. I’ve gone through the same thing. Reading your updated thoughts on “Metropolitan” brought it alllllll right back to me.
As for “Pump” — anyone who views this as Slater’s best performance is pretty much insane. “Heathers” will always be his crowning achievement. Quite frankly, if Slater isn’t playing a slightly mentally off character (as he did in “True Romance,” another fine performance) he’s rather boring. He needs maniac energy. We need to know he might be a little nuts. But the hokey factor is what gives “Pump” its appeal. I can’t imagine anyone watched this movie with a “f___ the authority!” zeal. Its quaint, slight rebellion makes it almost comforting. It was never my favorite movie, but I never thought of it as anything worth getting worked up about.
I have never seen “Metropolitan,” but I loved “Pump Up the Volume” when I saw it in theatres twenty years ago. I was a teenager myself at the time so I think I identified with the characters, particularly Slater’s, immensely. I have not seen it in its entirety since, only in parts while aimlessly channel surfing on cable. I would like to watch it again though, and maybe check out Metropolitan too. The only Whit Stillman film I think I’ve seen is “The Last Days of Disco,” which was good but not great.
I am glad Owen Gleiberman now likes Metropolitan but frankly his liking it is still grudging and—more important—he still doesn’t get it.
He sayd: “. . . they use their outdated posh manners to signify to one another that they still belong in that club.” Nonsense. Stillman is actually saying that manners are an expression of civilized social interaction. The standards of the UHB are important.
Gleiberman is right that Stillman’s writing is droll but Gleiberman completely misses the fact that that drollness is in the service of something deep and real and important. Metropolitan is a brilliant counterattack on the counterculture, which dismissed UHB standards as “phony”. Stillman uses irony gently in his ripostes to those forces that would tear down civilized behavior.
Gleiberman says: “But Stillman’s characters remain, more than ever, their own highly specific creations. Even though plenty of rich kids have come and gone since, they’re the last of a breed.” How sad that Gleiberman can only see these beautiful characters as “rich kids” and that he doesn’t even believe they could exist in real life.
I am glad that Gleiberman can now enjoy Metropolitan but it is too bad he still misses its deep meaning.
Richard Hobby
“Metropolitan” holds up perfectly well now, largely because Stillman made a point of making the setting seem timeless by avoiding pop cultural references. (The only real hint is the reference to Buñuel’s “Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie”, which would place the film sometime after 1972, a year when Stillman was about the same age as the characters he’s created.) Anyway, it doesn’t matter when the movie is set; like Broadway, the “untitled aristocracy” is always an invalid on the wane.
I still think you miss the importance of manners in the film; they’re not just a shibboleth or a secret club handshake; rather, they’re all these fading aristocrats have left to offer. They’re what makes these characters different from the “Gossip Girl” crowd, who may have wealth and Upper East Side real estate but can’t buy manners, class, taste, and breeding. Their vulgarity is the difference between new money and old money. (Man, I can’t believe I’m defending those “Metropolitan” snobs, but Stillman has made them sweet and vulnerable by making them wistfully aware of their own obsolescence.)
(Disclosure: Like you, Owen, I struck up a friendly acquaintance over the years with Stillman through various film-related events, and he became irked at me over a couple of points of contention I had with “The Last Days of Disco,” a movie I enjoyed but which I appreciate much more now than I did when it came out.)
As for “Pump up the Volume,” of course it’s overly self-dramatizing, but so are John Hughes movies and any other film that sees teens the way they see themselves. (To teens, every event is a crisis, every petty martinet authority figure a world-class tyrant, and every act of rebellion an earth-shaking revolution.) I can see why you’d find this irksome as an adult moviegoer (I did, and I was not far removed from my teen years when the film came out), but from a teen POV, much about it seems fresh, radical, exciting, and new, even Slater’s junior Jack Nicholson act (which, thankfully, he grew out of eventually). It’s not as good a movie as “Heathers” or the much cleaner Hughes films; its aspirations are loftier and artier, and I don’t think it achieves them that often. But it offers a potent pop catharsis that’s more thoughtful (and therefore, perhaps more disturbing and formidable) than those of, say, “Over the Edge” or “Rock and Roll High School.”
As an adult, one wishes one could talk to the youngsters in both “Metropolitan” and “Pump Up the Volume” and say, “You really have no idea what’s in store for you,” but they wouldn’t listen. Everyone has to make their own mistakes.
I’m glad you’re doing this exercise, Owen. Anyone who’s been a critic long enough should follow your example. I would like to know, though, for the movies like “Metropolitan” where you now reverse your initial opinion, what do you suppose is the reason that your judgment was clouded at the time?
Loved Metropolitan and its companion piece, Barcelona, but I really loved The Last Days of Disco and was glad when Criterion reissued it. It’s dialogue plus it captures the moment. Jennifer Beal (Flashdance)in a cameo is a droll touch.
Great article. I can¡¯t wait to hear more about your research tool. If it is as good as your other products, then you will have another winner. Your article pretty much summed up what I have been seeing too. Great to see some hard data.
You¡are¡amazing! This weblog is so great. I really hope a lot more people read this and get what you are saying, ¡¯cause let me tell you, it¡¯s critical stuff. I never would have thought about it this way unless I would run into your web site. Thanks for sharing it. I hope you¡¯ve excellent achievement.
Thanks for interesting blog post. You guys are always provide information that it makes it impossible not to want to buy your next product ;I can¡¯t wait to see what you guys come up with based on all your research and data that you gather.
Thanks for interesting blog post. You guys are always provide information that it makes it impossible not to want to buy your next product ;I can¡¯t wait to see what you guys come up with based on all your research and data that you gather.
Great article. I can¡¯t wait to hear more about your research tool. If it is as good as your other products, then you will have another winner. Your article pretty much summed up what I have been seeing too. Great to see some hard data.