Given what audacious, far-ranging, and sensually intoxicated filmmakers they are, Joel and Ethan Coen have never shown much of a rock & roll side. Okay, there was The Big Lebowski (1998), that deadbeat-soul-of-Los Angeles stoner cult classic. It was sprinkled with Dylan, Creedence, and Elvis, and it had that one goofily farfetched moment of surreal jukebox rapture: a druggy dream sequence, set to Kenny Rogers’ 1968 hit “Just Dropped In (To See What Condition My Condition Was In),” that was like Busby Berkeley on peyote at the bowling alley. I saw The Big Lebowski again recently, and sorry, I’m still not wild about it (I think it’s more arduous than inspired), but what that sequence indicates to me is that the Coens should seriously consider making a gloriously skewed pop musical.
I’m more convinced of that than ever having seen the spectacular use they make of the Jefferson Airplane song “Somebody to Love” in A Serious Man. This is one of those pop-music epiphanies worthy of Tarantino, Scorsese, or Paul Thomas Anderson — and the strange thing is, it’s just there, so unlikely yet so sublime, sitting right in the middle of the Coens’ highly personalized movie about a nebbishy Jewish family trying to make its way in Middle America in 1967.
A Serious Man opens with an old Yiddish parable (a fake, it turns out — the Coens just made it up), in which a kvetching couple in what looks like a 19th century Eastern European village invite an old man into their home who may or may not be a dybbuk (i.e., a malevolent spirit). This prologue introduces the movie’s grand theme — which is not, as many critics have said, an update of the Book of Job. Rather, the theme is a question: When bad things happen, are they the actions of God, or are they the result of people anxiously overreacting to what God does?
At this point the screen goes dark, and we see what looks like a golden ring, which is the outline of a mysterious tunnel that we’re suddenly whooshing through. The whole audience is traveling — through space? time? — with nothing to guide it but a familiar, gathering sound. It’s the thrashing ’60s beat and desperate, do-or-die romantic ferocity of Grace Slick, exhorting her listeners to find “somebody to love” in a world where that may be the only salvation left.
Here’s a taste of the song’s rapture:
So what, exactly, is a vintage Jefferson Airplane anthem doing in this movie? In A Serious Man, the Coens use “Somebody to Love” in two fascinating and resonant ways. When we first come out of that tunnel, we’re staring at a hard white piece of plastic — it’s a close-up of an earpiece, plugged into the head of 12-year-old Danny (Aaron Wolff), who is listening to “Somebody to Love” on his transistor radio in Hebrew school. What’s more than a bit trippy is that as the camera travels down that earpiece wire, it seems to be completing the journey out of the tunnel. In what is basically a realistic drama, the Coens present the leap from the peasant shtetl to the tract-house anonymity of Midwestern America as an act of science fiction. It’s as if the Jews of the old world weren’t just being transplanted — they were getting beamed up. The movie uses “Somebody to Love” as the sensuous electric pulse of the society they were now joining. And yet…it’s science fiction because, in some part of their hearts, they’re still in the shtetl. They’re in two worlds at once.
Late in the film, the song comes back — this time as high comedy. Danny has just completed his bar mitzvah (while stoned out of his gourd), and as a reward he gets an audience with the community’s chief rabbi, an ancient, wizened wizard of a Talmudic scholar who sits in his room like a Yiddishe mafioso, surrounded by musty texts and eerie things in bottles. The inaccessibility of the rabbi has been a joke throughout the film (Danny’s father, who could use some guidance, can’t begin to get a meeting), and so our curiosity about what he’ll finally say has reached the boiling point. Slowly, in his thick accent, the old man begins to speak, mouthing what sounds like it could only be a centuries-old Jewish proverb:
“Ven da truth is found…to be lies. And all da joy…vithin you dies.”
Yes, it’s the lyrics of “Somebody to Love.” Except that the rabbi, instead of voicing the song’s next line (“Don’t you want somebody to love?”), substitutes his own, more existential version. He asks: ”What then?”
Watching this moment, the audience, as it should, giggles in recognition. Yet the meaning of the song shines through with a new and peculiar beauty. According to A Serious Man, what those simple lines from a famous ’60s pop song describe, with despairing perfection (the truth revealed to be lies, the joy within you dying), is the condition of Jews in the modern, assimilated world. According to the movie, the deepest truths of their faith no longer hold; the joy of their path to transcendence has been dashed. And so…what then? That’s the question that Danny and his father must ask themselves. The rabbi has no answer. But the real answer, according to Joel and Ethan Coen, is…well, I can’t say it any better than Jefferson Airplane. And neither, apparently, could they.








I look forward to the Coens using White Rabbit.
“Rather, the theme is a question: When bad things happen, are they the actions of God, or are they the result of people anxiously overreacting to what God does?”
Very Interesting. However, I saw the central question, rather, to be between religion and existentialism. Was every major conflict in Larry’s life an act of (or test from) God? Or maybe is it that there is no God at all-that Larry’s life is so miserable simply, because it is.
This seemed very Coenesque (especially “No Country”). Maybe there is no explanation for Larry’s troubles, it’s just the natural order of things.
reeldealblog.com
Thanks for this, Owen. I’m not a fan of Lebowsk either, but I think A Serious Man is the most memorable, thought-provoking film of the year – and funny too. It may not be an update of Job, but Job is not irrelevant to the film. In the 38th chapter, God poses many questions to Job which radically question humans’ ability to understand the nature of things. The wife in the shtetl is sure that the visitor is a dybbuk, but he doesn’t behave like one and we’re left to doubt. Even Larry, with his formulas of uncertainty, admits that he doesn’t know if the cat is dead or not. The answer in Job is to trust in God’s plan. And finding someone to love “can’t hurt”.
Owen, not to detract from the main theme of your blog entry, but I wanted to add that I am not a fan of “The Big Lebowski” either. It is by no means a bad movie, and certainly has its moments, but it’s hardly the cult classic it has become in the minds of many moviegoers since its initial 1998 theatrical release.
You have great blog and this post is good!
—
best regards, Greg
how can I add to bookrmark your blog? would you like to visit mine? regards!
What the Rabbi said is: “Ven da truth is found…to be lies. And all da HOPE…vithin you dies. What then?” One word alteration. Then he answers his own question by saying, “Grace… Slick.”
Just sayin’.
Loved your commentary. Until I read it today, I had always been bothered by my inability to tie the dybbuck scene to the rest of the movie. A friend had tried to suggest that Si was a modern dybbuck for Larry, but that didn’t click for me. Your comments on people overreacting to what God does are very plausible link, as is the summary relating to assimilation. Although for me, the implied destruction of the school by the tornado and the bad news call from the doctor, both immediately after Larry signs off on the grade change, thus accepting the bribe, ties it all together. Larry “assimilates” when he breaks God’s rules and accepts the bribe. Loved it. Thanx for helping me out with that.
“When bad things happen, are they the actions of God, or are they the result of people anxiously overreacting to what God does?”
It’s unbelievable that someone could even possibly derive this thought as to being the central thesis of any Coen film, especially this one. There argument is not constricted by the quenching fists of religion, the discussion is moreover infinitely obscure. The idea of uncertainty reaches far beyond the grasps of any religion. Although God and religious teachings are considered as one possibility, spirituality is simultaneously being contrasted by a world of unknown and systematic yet uncontrolled chaos. This film was not meant for the immobile Christian buff, nor is it a confirmation of either testament. A Serious Man is a testament to those who seek truth in it’s purest form, neither swayed nor completely oblivious to religion, and find nothing but more uncertainty. The film also compiles a memoir or ode to their past, which was steeped in the Jewish Midwestern town they grew up in. Judaism acts as a backdrop to the unanswered, not the answer in it’s self. What the Coen’s tell the viewer is nothing not yet untold. Many of their films similarly lack full closure and refrain from giving the audience anything near full control. The Coen’s insist on letting go, allowing the world, whether spiritual or chaotic, to do as it pleases. A simple quotation is provided as the beginning of the film to forgo any troubling debate. “Receive with simplicity everything that happens to you”. It can also be said the Jefferson Airplane song speaks to what the Coens see as the most reasonable answer. Stop chasing the uncatchable, truth, and simply find love, as that will sooth the spiritual warriors concerns, although they would probably explain it in more lackadaisical manor. The film finishes as it starts, with uncertainty. And although the ending might be signifying some moral code the Coens believe possibly exists, we cannot know for sure as it is left unanswered. This film can only be fully enjoyed by a journeyman entrenched within the deep battle of existentialism. Those with simpler mind or in denial who settle for the meager teachings of man (religion), can not fully engage with this movie, and should most certainly not attempt to twist it’s meaning into some savior bent tirade.
On second note, the film is not solely for the uncertain, nor does the film’s uncertainty mean the Coen’s are on the existential hunt. Although I believe I’m sure they’ve battled the questions themselves, I’m pretty sure the film is simply characterizing those who do battle the unknown to no avail. And more likely the film is an ode to their father, who also was a professor at a university, but that in it’s self is well, unknown. In conclusion the film is not simply an ode to religion, and I think that much must be made clear.
the universe has no tolerance for complacency
Youareamazing! This weblog is so great. I really hope a lot more people read this and get what you are saying, cause let me tell you, its critical stuff. I never would have thought about it this way unless I would run into your web site. Thanks for sharing it. I hope youve excellent achievement.