Apr 24 2010 02:09 PM ET

J. Lo in 'The Back-up Plan': Why it's really all about her body

jennifer-lopez-backup-planImage Credit: Peter IovinoFor certain movie stars, the elevation of gossip culture has changed the meaning of what gossip is. In the ancient old days (like, you know, 1992), a star’s off-screen life was a carefully baked confection of reality and sugarcoating. When you read about her affairs, break-ups, marriages, new babies, or work-out routines, it all added up to a vision of the star that served the purpose of buffing and enhancing her on-screen image.

These days, a star’s off-screen life is still a carefully baked confection of reality and sugarcoating (though, at times, a little more reality does poke through). Only now, the narrative of that actual/half-glimpsed/half-concocted glossy-tabloid “reality” frequently trumps and transcends the movies themselves. You could, by all means, point to examples of this from the past; the Golden Age of Gossip probably started when Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton had their tempestuous affair on the set of Cleopatra (1963), a relationship that proved far more fascinating, and enduring, than anything in Cleopatra itself. Now, though, it’s become almost standard to think of the off-screen life of, say, a star of romantic comedies as bigger, bolder, tastier, and more compulsively dramatic than anything she actually does on-screen. To borrow a concept from Neal Gabler’s 1998 book Life the Movie: How Entertainment Conquered Reality, her life — in our eyes, at least — has become the chick flick she lives every day.

All of which brings me to Jennifer Lopez in The Back-up Plan, a movie that marks a case of one star’s off-screen life so trumping her on-screen one that the movie’s “reality” subtext is, in fact, its underlying essence. I’ve already reviewed The Back-up Plan, and found it to be, like so many romantic comedies, watchable and forgettable, with stray drops of charm popping out of a sea of formula. As Zoe, a New York pet-shop owner who has given up any hope of finding the right guy, gets herself pregnant via a sperm donor, and then finds the right guy after all (in other words, her entire romantic life unfolds in the wrong order), Lopez acts with her usual PowerPoint dynamism. The story, of course, is glorified fluff, but in this case the fluffiness is almost a vehicle for the real story, which is the film’s teasing invitation for women to gawk at J. Lo’s physique.

The Back-up Plan sets this up in the most literal of ways. It’s about a woman getting ready to have twins — and Lopez herself, of course, had twins two years ago. The cutesy-obvious true-life parallel may be the hook, but the hook doesn’t end there. This is Lopez’s first romantic comedy since Monster-In-Law (2005), and the early parts of the movie, before the heroine’s baby bump is showing, are like an advertisement for the wonders of what working out can do to get you back into shape after pregnancy. Lopez is now 40, she had twins, and she looks as radiant and shapely and smashing as ever. That’s part of the movie’s gossip-world come-on. But then, as Zoe starts to put on baby weight, we see Lopez, in essence, replaying her own pregnancy. It’s a calculated act of anti-vanity — but the way that J. Lo does it, with Zoe, in one scene, drawing attention to how bootylicious her butt once looked, it’s also a benign piece of voyeuristic theater, a daytime talk-show appearance in movie form, as The Back-up Plan cues us to admire the star for showing off her body in a less than “perfect” light. And even then, of course, she still looks marvelous.

Of course, the Gossip: The Movie school of her-life-is-your-fantasy doesn’t necessarily succeed. Just look at the so-so opening-day grosses for The Back-Up Plan, which indicate that J. Lo may well have stayed away from romcoms for too long — or, perhaps, that audiences don’t necessarily want to turn out in droves to see a light comedy about pregnancy sickness. But one thing’s for sure: This movie’s very DNA has been sprung from the off-screen appeal of the J. Lo brand. And that’s a brand that will almost certainly outlast it.

Comments (77 total) Add your comment
Page: 1 2 3 5
  • Michael

    Indeed, she looks absolutely stunning throughout the whole film–pregnant or not–who wouldn’t want to show that off! I mean, can you blame her?

  • Moe

    I am not paying for a movie just to see J-Lo body. The movie sucks and it’s forgettable. J-low isn’t the star she used to be anymore. She has stayed away from the spotlight for too long and in this ever wanting pop culture century we live in, if you stay away too long, we will FORGET about you no matter how big you were in the past. BYE BYE J-LO!

    • Lana

      If you haven’t seen the movie, then how do you know it “sucks”? It’s actually pretty damn funny!

      • jpratm

        yes it was funny !!! go see it and stop with the opinions with no base if you hvnt seen it STFU !!!

      • Sarah O

        I thought there were some funny parts in the movie, but overall, it wasn’t just forgettable — it was so overly cliched that it was pretty bad. Alex O’Loughlin looked great, but he’s kind of bland overall, and J.Lo is indeed beautiful, but I have never understood the fascination with her booty — it’s big! And not in a good way!

    • Carl Sagan

      Her old star name was J-LO. Her new star name is ALPHA BOOTY! Sorry, Arcturus…

  • Guiness

    The producers of this movie should have had a back-up plan.

    He-he-he.

    • crispy

      Shhhhh….. Guiness just won the gayest joke award!

  • Chele Belle

    Went to see the Back Up Plan to drool over Alex O’Loughlin. No other reason but that and I was not disappointed.

  • Lori

    I don’t think she stayed away too long. I think she makes bad choices in movies.

    • Sara

      100% agree

  • Linda

    Alex O’Loughlin was the only reason to see this movie. I was disappointed in the movie, but not in Alex.

  • Isis

    You’re THE MAN Alex.

    Move…on…Alex…please.

    You’re better than this..so much better.

    Their is life for you after this mangled mess of a film. Believe it.

    • Brenda

      A little dramatic there Isis lol but I agree with you that Alex is THE MAN!

  • anna

    I’m not paying $10 to look at lopez’s shape, no offense but what the hell is the writer of this article on? Not that she’s not a nice looking woman (especially with the amount of makeup and spanx she wears under her clothes) but to say that her looks are overrated would be an understatement. I’ve seen candid pics of her and she doesn’t excatly stop traffic. Please, get a grip.

  • Veracity

    Sorry, but if anyone is going to this movie to gawk at a body, it’s O’Loughlin’s they’re gawking at not Lopez’s.

  • sam

    This is a funny, entertaining movie and both Alex and JLo are beautiful and fun to watch. See the movie–you will leave smiling.

    • de

      Ditto.

  • PNK

    Gossip days started more in the 20s and with silent film stars. Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks, Gloria Swanson, Eroll Flynn, Garbo, Chaplin… lotsa newsy bits way before Taylor-Burton.
    J-Lo is not the only star who does a film to assure people are still watching her, either.

  • Renee

    It just occurred to me (I haven’t seen the film), but I hope that Alex’s career does not go the way of Gerard Butler’s :(

    • sam

      Gerard Butler has quite a nice career going–he is a voice actor in Dragon and he does both comedy and drama films. Not everything is a huge success for any actor, but Gerry is doing fine. I expect that Alex will do very well also. I hope that he finds success in films and on TV. He deserves it.

  • Adwina Lambert

    has-been j.ho must go!! tee-hee!!

  • UncleWalty

    Newsweek called it: the whole “J.Lo” thing a couple of years ago just killed her career. It may be that there’s no such thing as bad publicity, but there is such a thing as overexposure.

    • Jen

      Jennifer Lopez can’t act and she can’t sing. I’d say if anything, the J-Lo persona extended her career.

  • bowling trophy

    It is about the fetishization of the movie star; the logical endpoint of the objectification of the movie star is you fetishize his/her body. A fetish is a fixation; a “movie star” then becomes its reification. There is no longer a movie star in the sense that what was once a movie star who is a flesh-and-blood real person has now been transfigured into the body ultimately reified, a product (products are objectified), a brand.

    • Kelly

      Yawn.

Page: 1 2 3 5
Add your comment
The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject - or we may delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field.

When you click on the "Post Comment" button above to submit your comments, you are indicating your acceptance of and are agreeing to the Terms of Service. You can also read our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement

Find Movies and Showtimes

Powered by MovieTickets.com

Choose Your Movie

All movies

TV Recaps

Powered by WordPress.com VIP